<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cheating in Online Poker.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pokerphile.net/poker-tips/cheating-in-online-poker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pokerphile.net/poker-tips/cheating-in-online-poker/</link>
	<description>Texas Hold'em advice and strategy told from a seasoned online poker professional</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 04:21:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://pokerphile.net/poker-tips/cheating-in-online-poker/comment-page-1/#comment-35</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 07:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pokerphile.net/?p=5#comment-35</guid>
		<description>Collusion is an entirely different ball-park. I should probably write an article individually for that.

&#039;They obtained opponents&#039; hole card information by manipulating software code that was part of a legacy auditing system, and they were active players on the network from March 2006 to December 2007.&#039;
As it stands, this cheating was done by employees/developers. This article concerns things from a user-perspective - they can do all the searching they like and will not find a way to cheat the system. I may write another article concerning internal cheating, but that level of corruption is touched on in my Cold-Decking article already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Collusion is an entirely different ball-park. I should probably write an article individually for that.</p>
<p>&#8216;They obtained opponents&#8217; hole card information by manipulating software code that was part of a legacy auditing system, and they were active players on the network from March 2006 to December 2007.&#8217;<br />
As it stands, this cheating was done by employees/developers. This article concerns things from a user-perspective &#8211; they can do all the searching they like and will not find a way to cheat the system. I may write another article concerning internal cheating, but that level of corruption is touched on in my Cold-Decking article already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

